Archive

Archive for May, 2009

Book Review: The story of the Grail and the passing of Arthur

May 31st, 2009 4 comments

The End of Arthur

Just finished reading the last of the four books on Arthur by Howard Pyle: “The Story of the Grail and the passing of Arthur.” As with all books narrating this section of the Arthurian legend, it is profoundly sad. As we read about the way Lancelot behaves with the King we’re reminded of his glorious history. The first section however, deals with the achieving of the Grail itself.

Galahad achieves the Grail

The story is a continuation from the last book. Galahad is introduced as the most saintly of all knights and gets to achieve the grail along with Sir Bors and Sir Percival. However, a few things struck me. First of all, Galahad wins all his battles mainly due to the magic shield of Sir Balan which can resist all earthly weapons. With this shield, he even manages to overthrow his father Lancelot on a bridge. But where is the great worship in being able to win your battles because of a magic shield? Also, Galahad never fights with anyone before obtaining this shield and therefore his real skill is suspect.

Secondly, Galahad’s role in achieving the holy grail is no larger than that of Sir Percival or Sir Bors. Why then, is he hailed as being the primary achiever? It doesn’t seem to me that he had done anything special at all.

The section of the book goes through the motions of achieving the Grail. For me, the achievement of the Grail has never been important. It merely serves as a prelude to the next section – the demise of all that is grand in the Round Table.

The Story of the Grail and the Passing of Arthur

The Story of the Grail and the Passing of Arthur

The fall of Lancelot

In this section, Lancelot performs some of the most dastardly actions in the book. True, he was deceived by some knights who made it seem as if the Queen was calling him to her bower, but why did he go? They merely hooked him and made him act out what he wanted to do all along. He was obviously besotted with Guinevere and lost no time in going at night where he obviously did not belong – to her bedroom. First he gave up his wife for her, then he did this? In my mind, he deserved all the condemnation he got.

To make matters worse, he then tried to rescue her when she’s being judged by Arthur and ends up killing sir Gareth who was unarmed. This is beyond forgiveness. Sir Gareth was one of the most gentle and noble knights of the round table who loved Lancelot and was in fact, knighted by him as we saw in the previous book. He refused to plot against Lancelot and while Lancelot didn’t recognize him due to his state of mind, it just goes to show that he was so completely in the spell of Guenevere, that he didn’t’ care whom he killed.

Sir Gawaine’s anger

Along with Sir Gareth, Lancelot also killed four others of Sir Gawaine’s family making it five of his family members in toto. Sir Gawaine was willing to forgive Lancelot the death of his first three relatives since Lancelot killed them in combat and when they were armed. But he was unable to forgive Lancelot for the murder of his younger brothers Sir Gareth and Sir Gaheris. Quite understandably too.

His anger and hatred for Lancelot were tragic given his earlier love for him. He drives Arthur to war against Lancelot and keeps challenging him over and over – killing Sir Ector and seriously injuring Sir Bors, both of whom where Lancelot’s brothers. Lancelot is forced to fight and mortally wound Sir Gawaine who then curses Lancelot with his dying breath. I would expect no less from Sir Gawaine, and sympathize most strongly with him.

The passing of Arthur

Arthur more or less justifies his reputation as a “do-nothing” king as he lets Sir Gawaine dictate battle plans to him. He’s able to do little else but watch as his Knights die all around him – first in the quest for the Grail, then in the war against Lancelot, and finally, in the war against Sir Mordred who tries to usurp the throne. In spite of his weakness, you can’t help but feel sorry for him as he grieves over the demise of the Round Table and the days of chivalry. Sort of like Tolkien’s Silmarillion, the story ends with disaster following a glorious start. Truly poignant. One is reminded of the days of Sir Tristram and Sir Gareth. Of the bravery of Sir Lancelot and Sir Lamorak. Of knights errant and castles and ladies – where adventure was always to be found.

All that comes to an end with the death of Arthur. It never fails to move me. Each time I read it, it’s almost as if I wish that it would end differently somehow. But it never does…

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Book Reviews Tags:

Democracy in India – Ignoring the naysayers

May 20th, 2009 2 comments

The Rise of voices criticizing democracy in India

Throughout my school and college days – ever since I have been old enough to understand the meaning of such things, I have heard several criticisms of Democracy in India. A recent post by Rajesh Kalra on the Times of India blog on “The Chinese think big – we don’t”, attracted lots of comments basically saying the same thing – that India is not ready for a democracy. There are several reasons that are put forward to support this view such as:

  1. People must be educated for Democracy to work
  2. Democracy results in a slow decision making process
  3. Look at the caste system – democracy hasn’t been able to wipe even that out yet
  4. Democracy has resulted in poor infrastructure and corruption

Even my father used to wax nostalgic about the emergency and say that trains used to run on time and that everything went like clockwork. So it seems that this criticism isn’t new and the evidence is clear. There are lots of people in this country who wish it to be a dictatorship – or at least they wish it was an authoritarian regime. Most of the time these people look and compare India with China and proclaim that they’re pulling ahead of us in the “race’

I find this line of thought disturbing. There are many reasons why I feel that we have the best setup possible and to wish it to be any other way is foolishness.

The Miracle of India Democracy

Even though it’s not relevant to my case, I can’t help but start off with recognizing what we have done till now. There are people who feel that India is an utter failure. That we haven’t achieved anything in 60 years. They feel that India consists of self serving people who don’t care about society as a whole and that it’s each man for himself. Doubtless they feel this way due to their own experience with what they have seen or heard, or been told. And while I’m not here to discount their experiences, I would like to draw their attention to another side of India. And there is indeed another side. A very large and powerful side.

When I look at India, I see a nation that has survived against all odds. I see a country where there is so much bewildering variety that it boggles the mind. There have been other countries that have been compared to India in terms of variety. America being one of them. I’ve lived in America for about a year, and I can tell you, there is absolutely no comparison. In India, we have different native languages for just about every state. Each region has it’s own cuisine. Each area has it’s own sense of dressing.

People in India, look different when you travel from place to place. We have a Sikh Prime Minister, almost had a foreign born Prime Minister who couldn’t speak Hindi, and a Muslim president. Is it possible to name even one other country that would allow a foreign born woman to be it’s leader? Even the US hasn’t had a female president till date.

With such variety, everyone expected India to fail as a democracy. Till that time, democracy was tried out only in countries that had a homogeneous environment. It was a huge social experiment, and we have survived where no one expected us to survive. We have had election after election (with a 2 year hiccup in the middle) and now our way of life is firmly established. Political parties humbly accept the verdict of the people even when it means that entrenched powers must be displaced. The BJP moved over without a squeal in 2004 after losing despite being a “hardline” party. Something that by no means happens around the world. Look at Zimbabwe last year.

Also, it is a widely held belief that democracy is best sustained when the surrounding regions are democratic as well. In this aspect too, India has been an enigma. Surrounded by neighbors whose governments are either powerfully compromised, or not democracies at all, India is a glimmering example of holding onto ideals. A diamond in the rocks.

Democracy at work in India

Democracy at work in India

As Obama proclaimed a few days ago, “India is a shining example to us all.”

Comparisons with China

Most people when condemning India’s democracy point to China. The general drift of their logic goes something like this: “China is not a democracy. Look at them. Look at their growth. They have vision. They have long term policies. They are a growing power. The world is afraid of them etc etc.”

My only answer is: “So bloody what?”

Correlation does not equal causation. There are plenty of countries that are not democracies who are not doing well. Why don’t we look to our western neighbor Pakistan and praise their military for having taken over the country innumerable number of times? No. That we will not do. But we look at China and want to be like them. Also, we must realize once and for all, that the purpose of the government is for the people. The people cannot be used to serve the goals of the government or country. So if the country as a whole is successful and the people within it are not happy and don’t have the right to speak freely, then such a state is a failure, not a success.

China’s state and future

Each country is different. China as a country is much more homogeneous than India. They have a shared common history, a largely common language and similar ethnic origins. Nowhere close to the diversity of India.

Moreover, history shows that far from being an open and close case, China is extremely complex. There is evidence that as people in China get more prosperous, they will be less likely to want to submit to authority. Heed my words. In the next few decades, there will be an upheaval in China as more and more people start wishing for democracy. And it won’t be a peaceful transition. No one likes to give up power. There will be chaos as the country’s entrenched institutions try and hold onto power.

If what I say doesn’t happen, then well and good. No one wants misery and suffering. But the chances are that sooner or later, China will become like India, and not the other way around.

False choice between Freedom and Development

Another frequent argument that I hear all the time is that there are more pressing issues in India than freedom of speech and civil liberties. Proponents claim that the Indian government has better and more important things to do than to ensure that women can party at night, or to debate the legality of homosexuality. There are two major flaws in this logic. The first is that of the false dichotomy, and the second is to assume that without civil liberties, things like infrastructure matter a great deal.

The false dichotomy

It’s foolish to say “Concentrate on clean water, not on free speech.” Does the government have only one hand? Is it composed of only one person who can only do one thing at a time? Is it possibly conceivable that when the ministry for infrastructure is trying to get clean water to villages, the home ministry has to stop functioning? Beware of the false dichotomy.

My feeling is that when people say stupid things like this, they mean something else. These people I suspect have a sense of guilt that they’re living comfortable lives when others are not and in order to try and cope with this, they want everyone else to suffer as well. Be that as it may, that is their problem and not relevant to this discussion.

Which matters more?

Those who claim that they would prefer India to be a dictatorship or an authoritarian state if trains ran on time and the roads were clean, either need a history lesson, or they’re in the wrong place.

Such individuals should have lived in Nazi Germany. Clean roads, potable water, economic security, nice cars, food for everyone – what more do you want right? Why not get a taste of Stasi’s East Berlin then? Sure, you never know if the man next to you is a government agent who can put you behind bars forever if you so much as utter word against the government. Or I suppose it’s completely irrelevant that you’re not supposed to hold any political views other than what the government wants you to have. Oh and did I mention that the news you read is “approved” by the state before it comes to you? And books? You can only read those sanctioned by the government – of course.

Oh and remember the free and fair Internet? – it’s a myth. There’s no such thing.

But hey – there were clean roads! And clean water!

Ok, enough of the heavy sarcasm. The bottom line is that people need to read up a bit of history. They need to know and imagine what it’s like to live under a state that has no freedoms. They need to get a taste of the feeling that you just want to scream out something abusive against the government – just for the sake of being able to do so.

There are people who have given up their very lives for freedom. Our Indian Freedom struggle is the best example. Who the hell cares if the Britishers were fantastic administrators? Did we sacrifice our lives and drive them out only so that we could have our very own home brewed dictators? Are we saying that only Indians have the right to be dictators over Indians?

It’s an insult to the memories of the freedom fighters when people say they would rather have a dictatorial government. Let them go to some other place where they can have their clean roads and towering skyscrapers – Democracy in India was bought with the blood of tens of thousands of people. It’s a national treasure, and one that every Indian must at least acknowledge if not respect.

Shining examples of India’s Democracy

For those still not satisfied with India’s remarkable achievement, here are some facts that should make you feel proud:

Congress got voted out after the Emergency

If people were so thrilled during the emergency with an orderly government and trains running on time, why did they boot the Congress government out immediately after? This shows that people love their freedoms and that the fabric of democracy runs deep.

Inquiries after atrocities

Atrocities happen in every country – in India, America, as well as China. What matters is how they are handled afterwards?

In China, what happened after the Tianmen Square massacre? Never mind that even the most corrupt Indian party wouldn’t dream of opening fire on unarmed and innocent protesters consisting mainly of students merely for voicing their frustration with the government. But what about the aftermath? Would you believe that the Chinese government doesn’t even allow it’s citizens to discuss the incident? Chinese history has been rewritten to ensure that people never learn about the massacre of 7000 people. The link that you find at the beginning of this paragraph is unaccessible in China. Children born afterwards don’t even know that it happened since it’s not mentioned in any textbooks. Their “progress” has been bought at a heavy price – such an incident if allowed to remain in people’s consciousness would destabilize the country. This shows that the Chinese way of life has deep problems that are only kept under the surface temporarily – waiting to come up to the surface. History has shown us that humans after all, eventually like to be free.

Image Credit: Grant Neufeld

Tiananmen Squaure Massacre Protest - Mind you, this is outside the Chinese Consulate in Canada. Such a protest would not be allowed within China itself

Tiananmen Squaure Massacre Protest – Mind you, this is outside the Chinese Consulate in Canada. Such a protest would not be allowed within China itself

On the other hand, atrocities in India always come back to bite their perpetrators years later. There is no public misinformation campaign. No changing of textbooks. The Anti Sikh riot protests in 1984 still return to plague the Congress. Advani is still tainted with the demolition of the Babri Masjid and Narendra Modi will never be free of the black mark of the Godhra riots and may even go to jail for it. Such a thing could never happen in China where there is no free press and the government prevents any official inquiry into the matter.

Right to Information Act (RTI)

Things move slowly in India, but they do move. The RTI act was a huge step forward and while it’s implementation is not very satisfactory, there is at least the intention. The implementation will come in time. Can you imagine such a thing happening in China?

Public Debate

Remember the Indo US nuclear deal which almost brought the government down? Remember the debate? The news coverage? The analysis? None of that would have been possible in an authoritarian state. The government would have just done whatever it wants.

An Independent Judiciary

This is nothing to be sneezed at. The Supreme Court of India has proved to be a wonderful institution with its concept of the PIL and the “Basic Structure” doctrine. Only in a democratic country like India, can a private NGO like NAZ file a case against the government for the criminalization of Homosexuality (Article 377).

Give it time

The people of the country shouldn’t be in a hurry. 60 years is a very short time for a country of the size and diversity of India. America has been a Democracy for around 200 years now, and it was only 30 years ago that discrimination against blacks was removed – similar to our caste system, but legalized. That way, we are even better off than they are.

Countries in the EU have had upwards of 400 years to practice and perfect their democracy and none of them is as diverse or as large as India. Given what we’ve achieved after 60 years, it’s a bloody miracle. So cut some slack. You’re living in a miraculous country that has defied every single prediction made about it. You’re free.

Don’t compare India with China. Let them be the “greatest.” Let them be “feared.” So what, even if it is true (Debatable – how do you define “great”)? It’s not worth the price of freedom. Our own growth is nothing to be sneezed at. We’re a democracy, and we’re headed in the right direction.

The very same charge that people level against India, is actually it’s greatest strength – it’s complacency. We’re relaxed. We pose no threat to anyone. No one cares so much that they’re willing to sacrifice themselves for radical change. The common man doesn’t like the extremism that can accompany “progress”. We’re content to let things take their own sweet course. And we’re happy. So don’t worry. Everything will be just fine.

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Politics Tags:

Book Review: The Story of Sir Lancelot and His Companions

May 19th, 2009 No comments

The story of sir Lancelot and his companions – An Overview

This is the third book in the four book set on the Arthurian Legends by Howard Pyle. As I noted in my previous review of the third book: The story of the champions of the Round Table, Pyle’s magic is in detailing the large number of adventures that the heroes go through. There are several important characters that are covered in this book including Sir Gareth (also known initially as Beuamains on account of his beautiful hands), Sir Ewaine, Sir Bors, Sir Ector and Sir Gawaine. Of course, a huge chunk of the book is reserved for the further adventures of Sir Lancelot whom we already followed along in the previous book.

The Story of Sir Lancelot and His Companions - Book Review

The Story of Sir Lancelot and His Companions - Book Review

Sir Gareth

The book starts off with the story of Sir Gareth of Orkney and how he spent time in King Arthur’s court being treated as a “kitchen knave” – especially by Sir Kay. He’s later shown to have remarkable patience with the lady Lynette who keeps abusing him, though it’s made clear as time goes on that she actually likes him and merely wants to piss him off. In spite of it all, Gareth falls in love with her sister whom he rescues from the Red Knight of the red lawns.

This story, as with others in the book, are slightly different from the ones recounted in “L Morte D’Arthur” which is usually acclaimed as the definitive work. But as observed in an earlier piece, when it comes to legends, there is no definitive work, and the beauty of it all is in how different the versions are. Pyle’s characters are generally more noble and sweet than how they are shown in other well known versions, and it is for this reason that you’ll enjoy reading about them.

The Adventure of the Fountain

Possibly the most important and longest running adventure in the book (with the exception of Lancelot’s “Worm of Corbin” story in terms of importance), this plot details the magical fountain that the wicked enchantress (don’t you just love them?) Vivien creates and how it is the bane of “The city of the fountain”. The primary focus of this plot is Sir Ewaine and to a much lesser extent Sir Sagramore and Sir Percival. Even Sir Lancelot comes in to make an appearance at the end.

Lancelot and the Lady Elaine

This is where the book gets really interesting. This is the only story in the Arthur’s tales, where I see the lady Elaine being totally and completely betrayed by Lancelot. In all other works, she is either a somewhat insane, if pitiable woman, or a general schemer.

In Pyle’s recounting of the legend, she is the noble daughter of the King of Corbin in whose city Lancelot slays the famous dragon or “worm” of Corbin. She falls in love with Lancelot who behaves quite unchivalrously with her – hiding his face so as not to show his pleasure when she asks him to go back to Arthur’s court as well as openly ditching her for Queen Guenivere though she is his lawful wife.

Guenivere also comes across as a nasty, jealous, and spiteful woman who drives Lancelot to madness by taunting him and later in the book, deliberately keeping him away from Elaine to whom he was married. On closer inspection though, it seems that Lancelot is quite happy to let her do whatever she wants with him.

Elaine’s brother Sir Lavaine accuses Lancelot of abandoning his sister and leaving her to die in a nunnery. All very unpleasant and not at all in keeping with Lancelot’s goody two shoes image. I mean most people forgive him for his affair with Guenivere, but deliberately abandoning his wife for her is a bit much.

Gawaine and the Chalice along with Bors

However, the story isn’t all bad and ends with hope when Sir Gawaine and Sir Bors are sent on a mission by a voice from the heaven’s to get Lancelot’s baby whom we are told later becomes Sir Galahad – the greatest and most pure knight of the Round Table who gets to sit in the prized Seige Perilous. Gawaine has his own curious adventures before this by being turned into a dwarf by the lady Vivien. He later meets Merlin (who is trapped) and learns that the end of the Round Table is near and will culiminate with the search for the Holy Grail.

The Story of Sir Lancelot and his companions – The ending

The ending of the story serves as a good launching pad for the fourth book which I’m currently reading. It gives a taste of what’s to come with Merlin’s prophecy and the birth of Galahad paving the way. All in all, a fascinating read and one that has given me many hours of reading entertainment on my trusty iPod Touch. It’s out of copyright and you can pick it up on Google Books. It’s almost ready on Gutenberg and is awaiting completion of Post Processing (PP). You can pick up a rough draft of it after creating a user ID on the Distributed proofreaders site. You’ll miss the pictures, but otherwise it’s almost perfect. Gotta love free books!

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Book Reviews Tags:

India vs America – How Indian cities are better

May 15th, 2009 10 comments

I’ve been in the USA for almost a year now and have had ample time to look at and view the structure of urban development in this country. Of course, there’s no doubt that due to greater affluence, there is a higher standard of living over here, but when it comes to India vs America from the point of view of the structure of the cities and villages, there’s no doubt in my mind which is better. For my Indian readers, let me try and explain how US cities are organized.

US cities and Zoning Laws

Let me start off by saying that what you see on TV regarding US cities isn’t true. On TV, you only see the big cities like Chicago, New York, DC, Los Angeles etc. Those are like the Indian cities of Delhi, Chennai and the like. Most of the US (95%) is organized into areas called suburbs – like our villages. Unlike the villages in India however, people are moving into the suburbs instead of away from them. So they’re growing. And as a person who has lived in Indian cities both big and small all his life, I can tell you first hand that the suburbs of America are a nightmare.

The major features of US suburbs is something called zoning. Zoning means that residential areas where people live are completely separated by large distances from areas where you can shop or go to work. This in itself would be ok, but for one hitch. The density of the suburbs is so low, that there is almost zero public transportation. No buses with any degree of proximity, and no trains that can take you within the districts themselves (only between districts).

Image Credit: Barrie Sutcliffe

India vs America - The suburbs
India vs America – The suburbs

This means that there is no viable means of transportation other than cars. And for someone like me who doesn’t drive at all due to environmental issues, it’s completely unlivable. Just imagine – to step out of the house to get a tube of toothpaste, you can’t just walk upto a kirana store nearby. You have to drive! You have to drive everywhere, with no exceptions. And in cars. Forget motorcycles. Most bikes here are specialized for power racing and are more expensive overall than cars. Also, the cold weather makes driving impossible for most of the year. In other words, you can’t suddenly feel like having a cup of coffee and stroll over to your local chai shop.

Cycling is also not viable since the distances are simply too large to cover. What I would give for some small little grocery stores littered around like in India! Where you can just step out in your sandals and walk across for a quick bite and a bar of soap maybe. In 25 years, I have never had a problem with living in any Indian city without a car. Even in Delhi University, a rickshaw would take you to Kamala Nagar in 10 mins for Rs. 5! Here there are no cabs on the streets you can just hail down like autos. You have to call one to your doorstep.

US suburbs are lonely places. There is nothing on the roads except for cars. While walking down the road, you see no humans at all! It’s just the whoosh of cars all over the place. In India, if you step out, there are people everywhere bumping into you, boys playing cricket on the roads, dogs roaming around – you feel that you’re not alone. Here you never meet any living creature on the roads. Just birds.

Image Credit: Beppie K

Where are the humans?
Where are the humans?

India vs America – the car culture

The US is a car based society. It’s unfortunate that Indians want to be like that as well. But in my opinion, it will never get as bad as it is in the US. For the simple reason that the US suburbs were built from the ground up keeping cars in mind. So there are large spaces and wide gaps that you can cross only with cars to work and to shop for the smallest thing. In India, the cities and towns are already built and you can’t demolish them. So you can always walk here and there. We’re lucky. We’re also lucky that politicians keep bickering and can’t make up their minds what to do. True, this prevents good long term policy from being enacted, but it also prevents stupid policy being enacted like that of suburban development in the US.

Image Credit: Rich_Lem

And you thought Indians lived in Boxes?
And you thought Indians lived in Boxes?

So to those of my fellow Indians who are thinking of coming to the US. Forget the image. It’s not a nice place to be. Don’t come here. You’ll miss the heat and crowds before you know it. You’ll miss the ability to walk to your local tea stall. You’ll miss driving on bikes. You’ll be stuck in a smelly tin can day after day for 405 hours each year. How this can be anything that anyone wants, I have absolutely no idea.

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Personal Tags: