<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Number of Google search results &#8211; Ubiquity Firefox extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/</link>
	<description>My thoughts, haikus and freelance musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:01:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafa</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-8759</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 17:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-8759</guid>
		<description>Ohhh, 

could you try to search in your memories this script?

Thanks for everything</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh, </p>
<p>could you try to search in your memories this script?</p>
<p>Thanks for everything</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhagwad</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-8758</link>
		<dc:creator>bhagwad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-8758</guid>
		<description>Hi Rafa...sorry about that. I moved my hosting to a new provider and forgot to copy the scripts along with it - that&#039;s why you can&#039;t see it anymore. It looks like that script is lost forever :( ...sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rafa&#8230;sorry about that. I moved my hosting to a new provider and forgot to copy the scripts along with it &#8211; that&#8217;s why you can&#8217;t see it anymore. It looks like that script is lost forever :( &#8230;sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafa</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-8757</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-8757</guid>
		<description>Please, could you give me the path or url to see this Ubiquity script???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, could you give me the path or url to see this Ubiquity script???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubiquity Commands updated for Ubiquity 0.5 &#124; Expressions - Bhagwad Jal Park</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubiquity Commands updated for Ubiquity 0.5 &#124; Expressions - Bhagwad Jal Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-209</guid>
		<description>[...] find the number of Google Search Results for a given [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] find the number of Google Search Results for a given [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryce2meetu</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>bryce2meetu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Yes it&#039;s working well. 
Thank you so much </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it&#039;s working well.<br />
Thank you so much </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhagwad</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>bhagwad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-207</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2073&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@bryce2meetu&lt;/a&gt; 
Hi, 
 
Thanks for pointing it out. I&#039;ve fixed it now - you should be able to use the right command </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2073" rel="nofollow">@bryce2meetu</a><br />
Hi, </p>
<p>Thanks for pointing it out. I&#039;ve fixed it now &#8211; you should be able to use the right command </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryce2meetu</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>bryce2meetu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Hi bhagwad. 
 
I&#039;m using your pagerank command and it is working great.  I would like to try results-google but when I subscribe to this page&#039;s feed it actually contains a torrent search command.  Where can I get results-google? 
 
Thanks in advance. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi bhagwad. </p>
<p>I&#039;m using your pagerank command and it is working great.  I would like to try results-google but when I subscribe to this page&#039;s feed it actually contains a torrent search command.  Where can I get results-google? </p>
<p>Thanks in advance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajid</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Thanks bhagwad, that was quite helpful. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks bhagwad, that was quite helpful. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhagwad</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>bhagwad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-204</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1475&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Sajid&lt;/a&gt; 
Dear Sajid, 
 
The number of results that show up in Google are only one side of the equation. The other side is how many times is that keyword/phrase being searched for. 
 
Whether or not you decide to optimize for a particular keyword depends on the relationship between those two variables. Usually you have to look at hundreds of keywords and their statistics to decide which ones you want to optimize for. It&#039;s quite exhausting really... 
 
Personally I like to divide my keyword sets into Long term, medium term, and short term. That way, my clients know what to expect. I also write on an SEO blog for one of my clients. You can perhaps glean some info from there. Here is the link: &lt;a href=&quot;http://seonotes.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://seonotes.com/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1475" rel="nofollow">@Sajid</a><br />
Dear Sajid, </p>
<p>The number of results that show up in Google are only one side of the equation. The other side is how many times is that keyword/phrase being searched for. </p>
<p>Whether or not you decide to optimize for a particular keyword depends on the relationship between those two variables. Usually you have to look at hundreds of keywords and their statistics to decide which ones you want to optimize for. It&#039;s quite exhausting really&#8230; </p>
<p>Personally I like to divide my keyword sets into Long term, medium term, and short term. That way, my clients know what to expect. I also write on an SEO blog for one of my clients. You can perhaps glean some info from there. Here is the link: <a href="http://seonotes.com/" rel="nofollow">http://seonotes.com/</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajid</title>
		<link>http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2009/technology/number-google-search-results-ubiquity-firefox.html/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhagwad.com/blog/?p=469#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Hi Bhagwad, 
 
Thanks for sharing the good news. 
 
My second question was: Let&#039;s say you recieve 100 pages after you search for a keywird. And for another keyword you get 150 something...and so on. Now does their exizt a formulae or a threshold value that says that if there exist this many (for example 200) pages then the word is worth optimizing. 
I think you understand now, I mean to say that how you find out that this is a good term as it shows 100 or 150 or 200 pages. 
 
Thanks for your help 
Sajid </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bhagwad, </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing the good news. </p>
<p>My second question was: Let&#039;s say you recieve 100 pages after you search for a keywird. And for another keyword you get 150 something&#8230;and so on. Now does their exizt a formulae or a threshold value that says that if there exist this many (for example 200) pages then the word is worth optimizing.<br />
I think you understand now, I mean to say that how you find out that this is a good term as it shows 100 or 150 or 200 pages. </p>
<p>Thanks for your help<br />
Sajid </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 495/495 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.bhagwad.com @ 2012-05-22 03:50:13 -->
