Archive

Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

US Corporations to India: “Don’t dare use Free Software!”

March 9th, 2010 4 comments

Some software really is free. There’s no need to buy it, it works great and sometimes even better than that which you pay for. OpenOffice is one example of such software that completely replaces the expensive MS Office suite. The cost savings can be so great, that Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) recently replaced MS Office on every single computer with OpenOffice right over the weekend!

Of course, US Corporations hate free software with a vengeance. Microsoft’s CEO Steve Ballmer for example, has called Linux “a cancer”. Free software (also called Open Source when the source code is available) has a habit of nudging out expensive software solutions and improving faster than any paid software. However, it’s only recently that US corporations using their clout have tried to make using Open Source software a crime.

US Corporations try to make Open Source Software Illegal

US Corporations try to make Open Source Software Illegal

Many governments – especially poor ones – have tried to save piles of money by encouraging the use of Open Source software in administration. Such governments include India, Brazil and Indonesia. Alarmed by this, the companies with money have been encouraging the US government to place these countries on a blacklist for “failing to build respect for intellectual property rights!”

Wha? Did I miss something? It’s not a secret that many developing countries have very high rates of piracy which companies like Microsoft claim is theft. So when a government decides to prevent the so called theft and instead uses software that is free instead, corporations suddenly cry foul? It’s obvious to the meanest intelligence, that what is expected of a sovereign government is not to clamp down on piracy, but rather to continue to unnecessarily shovel money into the coffers of already fat corporations!

For a country like India, the substantial savings from using Open Source software can be channeled into improving the lot of impoverished people or improving the government’s fiscal deficit. This is unacceptable according to the moneyed powers who want that cash to flow to them instead.

This issue merely highlights the stranglehold that corporations have on the US government, the effects of which are felt halfway across the world in India. If they’re successful, we will be included on the US’s special 301 blacklist which might adversely affect our trade negotiating power on other issues.

Personally, I don’t think that the recommendations will be accepted by the US trade department (perhaps I’m being overly optimistic?), but the mere fact that private interests with money can dictate the direction of governmental procedures on such a large and brazen scale is scary.

Given all this, I’m glad I’ve slowly been shifting away from all paid software. I now use Ubuntu (a Linux variant) exclusively as my Operating System, Google Docs instead of MS Office, Wordpress as my blogging platform, and Pidgin as my Instant Messenger software. No longer do I have to shell out money and adhere to restrictions such as how many times I can reinstall my OS and I don’t have to “activate” or “crack” my software anymore. Welcome to the world of free software!

1 person likes this post.

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Politics Tags:

Are Indians finally becoming Responsible?

March 3rd, 2010 4 comments

It’s something of a national pastime to bash Indians. We’re always held up to be the world’s worst citizens in terms of behavior and not caring about those around us. Articles abound regarding the unconscionable practices of Indians and an economist even wrote a book on why we Indians are the way we are.

Rajesh Kala – a blogger for the Times of India – never misses an opportunity to crib about India and sing the praises of China and always complains about the despairing feeling one gets when thinking about the Indian’s behavior vis a vis the rest of the world. One article article even tries to elaborately explain why Indians don’t give back to society using the notion of reincarnation!

I must admit it’s tempting to believe all that one hears of Indians. Coming back to India from the US made me realize how we can’t form queues (but only with other Indians!) and how we don’t trust one another to stay put and behave decently thereby creating a chicken and egg situation.

And especially in the matter of paying tax, I always thought that Indians would seize any opportunity to evade paying Income Tax if they wouldn’t be caught. After all if we’re completely socially unconscious, then trying to evade tax is a perfectly logical outcome.

But sometimes I feel that things are not all that bad. I was frequenting a forum of freelancers today where a thread was seeking answers as to how to save on Income Tax. Nothing wrong with that of course. Tax planning is a perfectly sensible and respectable practice. The thread wasn’t seeking tax evasion techniques, but merely legitimate means to reduce the tax burden.

It wasn’t the advice so much as the sentiments that went with the advice that surprised me. Most of the comments expressed the opinion that it was our duty to pay tax even if there are doubts as to the efficacy of the government to utilize the funds. Here are some of them: (click the last two to view the comments properly)

It’s even more heartening to remember that these sentiments are expressed by random freelancers – those who are in an easy position to avoid paying tax by hiding their income. Salaried people don’t have a choice, and businesses are too conspicuous to avoid it. Freelancers on the other hand have a lot of ways to avoid tax scrutiny, and to see these same people say that India needs the money and that we must do our duty by paying tax puts the lie to all our rigid stereotypes about Indians and their “dog eat dog” mentality.

I mean its so easy to say something like “If only I don’t pay tax, then the country won’t fall to pieces” or “Why should I fatten the pockets of politicians and babus?” Both statements have a certain logic to them – a logic that should be highly appealing to a “selfish Indian.” But instead we see a sentimental patriotism that I didn’t really expect to find.

So perhaps things aren’t that bad after all and there’s reason to hope. Perhaps behind the boorish Indian there has started to flourish a sense of what is good and bad for the country and for others. If so, we must give up our stereotypes for the sake of those who are making an effort to change. It’s not right to brand even one person unjustly – national pastime or no.

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Politics Tags:

Respecting our Army – 2 lessons from the US

November 26th, 2009 3 comments

Followers of my blog know that most of my impressions of the US are hardly flattering. But one really must give credit where it’s due. One of the great things about this country is the respect and treatment they extend to their armed forces, and this is something that India can really emulate.

Killings of Indian army personnel on the border are an everyday affair for us Indians. Perhaps because of the sheer number of tragedies, it’s impossible to praise and keep track of every death. But our army faces a shortcoming of quality officers and rightly so. Why would any intelligent and promising young person join up? Apart from patriotism, do they have any other motivation to enroll? True they get certain benefits – cheap food, accommodation, and education for their children. But do they get public respect?

Image Credit: $owmya

Respect for Indian Military Personnel

Respect for Indian Military Personnel

In my year or so of stay in the US, I’ve been astounded by the respect and admiration the American people display towards people in the army. Though it sometimes borders on Jingoism, we can learn much from the Americans in this regard. By following these two simple steps, we can ensure that quality people become motivated to enlist.

1. Mention the Forces frequently in Public gatherings

When people gather together – either in a plane, or in a concert, or a theater, an announcement can be made on the lines of, “Before we start, let’s take a moment to thank our military personnel who are sacrificing their lives for us.” Or “Can we have a big hand for the brave men and women who keep our country secure.” Military personnel can also be asked to stand up and then given a round of applause.

Benefit: This lets them know they are valued and appreciated. It reassures them that their job is important.

2. Advertise Well

Currently enrollment in the National Defense Academy (NDA) is done only via a formal boring tender-style advertisement in the newspaper. In order to attract the best talent, we need to make life in the armed forces more appealing. It’s all about marketing. A video with inspiring music (but not over the top cheesy) which conveys the sort of meaningful life that most young people seek. A meaningful active life with integrity. I’m sure a good media company can make a great deal out of it.

They can show it on TV, in theaters and have well crafted, glossy and tasteful posters strategically placed in high profile areas where we normally see high value brands. Like 5-star hotels, and prime Billboard space. The total cost of all this is negligible (compared to the defense budget) and will repay itself many times over in better quality people entering the army, navy, and air force.

Basically we need to improve the visibility of our armed forces in every sphere of life. Veterans and Disabled personnel all need to be taken note of, and given the respect and adulation that their counterparts receive in the US.

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Politics Tags:

Why India isn’t ready for a Uniform Civil Code

November 23rd, 2009 3 comments

This post isn’t going to make me very popular with the progressive Indian crowd. I don’t blame them. A Uniform Civil Code (UCC) for India will mean that there will be only one civil law for all religions and for all people. As of now for example, Muslims have a separate marriage law and Christians have a separate inheritance law. The Indian Constitution states that the government should try and ensure that over time, there is just one law for everyone. Mind we’re not talking about Criminal law which is the same for everyone. Just Civil law.

I used to be a big believer in a Uniform Civil code for India too, until I began to see things differently and began to understand why India has survived as a Democracy for so long against all odds. I’ve come to realize that people don’t like their identities to be subsumed by a larger identity – especially when they feel threatened.

Image Credit: Adam Foster | Codefor

India's diversity is its strength

India's diversity is its strength

All over the world we see people struggling to maintain their identity – to differentiate themselves from a larger identity that they feel threatens their own. The Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, the Uighurs (or Uyghurs) in China, the Tibetan population, and too many others to list here. These movements are worldwide. Even countries with uniform and homogeneous cultures have separatist movements. The French for example, fiercely protect their language and identity and the Danish people will pay immigrants to leave if they can’t integrate culturally.

Given all these movements, it’s nothing short of a miracle that India which has 1,576 languages (according to the 1991 census), and a dizzying multitude of races has managed to survive so long without being split apart several times over. The main reason for this is the fact that India doesn’t try and integrate everything by force. It just lets things be. Force begets force.

India doesn’t believe in coercion. It accepts everything and everyone. It doesn’t try and control. Many people claim that India’s weakness is that it doesn’t take anything too seriously. They are wrong. It isn’t weakness. It’s strength.

I can’t help but quote from the Tao Teh Ching here – it’s so apt that it might have been written for India:


When government is lazy and blunt
The people are kind and honest;
When government is efficient and severe
The people are discontented and deceitful.

and

Those who lead people by following the Tao
don’t use weapons to enforce their will.
Using force always leads to unseen troubles.

and finally

Why are the people rebellious?
Because the rulers interfere too much.
Therefore they are rebellious.

As things stand right now in India, most people don’t feel threatened by a government that is chill with everything. No one takes anything too seriously. There are fights and battles, but the disturbance they cause is relatively small. As of now, I feel that the imposition of a Uniform Civil Code by force will make people feel threatened.

It goes against the grain of India to make things uniform. India is a mass of contradictions. Each state is like a separate country – a bit like the European Union rather than the US, with each having its own culture, and language. Even the Chief Justice of India has commented on how the Uniform Civil Code is a sensitive issue.

India has found stability because of its contradictions. Instead of trying to resolve contradictions, we let them thrive side by side. Destroying those contradictions and bringing everything in line with logic, may be a pretty ideal, but it will be the end of India as we know it.

What’s your take?

Should India impose a Uniform Civil Code by force?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Politics Tags:

Democracy in India – Ignoring the naysayers

May 20th, 2009 2 comments

The Rise of voices criticizing democracy in India

Throughout my school and college days – ever since I have been old enough to understand the meaning of such things, I have heard several criticisms of Democracy in India. A recent post by Rajesh Kalra on the Times of India blog on “The Chinese think big – we don’t”, attracted lots of comments basically saying the same thing – that India is not ready for a democracy. There are several reasons that are put forward to support this view such as:

  1. People must be educated for Democracy to work
  2. Democracy results in a slow decision making process
  3. Look at the caste system – democracy hasn’t been able to wipe even that out yet
  4. Democracy has resulted in poor infrastructure and corruption

Even my father used to wax nostalgic about the emergency and say that trains used to run on time and that everything went like clockwork. So it seems that this criticism isn’t new and the evidence is clear. There are lots of people in this country who wish it to be a dictatorship – or at least they wish it was an authoritarian regime. Most of the time these people look and compare India with China and proclaim that they’re pulling ahead of us in the “race’

I find this line of thought disturbing. There are many reasons why I feel that we have the best setup possible and to wish it to be any other way is foolishness.

The Miracle of India Democracy

Even though it’s not relevant to my case, I can’t help but start off with recognizing what we have done till now. There are people who feel that India is an utter failure. That we haven’t achieved anything in 60 years. They feel that India consists of self serving people who don’t care about society as a whole and that it’s each man for himself. Doubtless they feel this way due to their own experience with what they have seen or heard, or been told. And while I’m not here to discount their experiences, I would like to draw their attention to another side of India. And there is indeed another side. A very large and powerful side.

When I look at India, I see a nation that has survived against all odds. I see a country where there is so much bewildering variety that it boggles the mind. There have been other countries that have been compared to India in terms of variety. America being one of them. I’ve lived in America for about a year, and I can tell you, there is absolutely no comparison. In India, we have different native languages for just about every state. Each region has it’s own cuisine. Each area has it’s own sense of dressing.

People in India, look different when you travel from place to place. We have a Sikh Prime Minister, almost had a foreign born Prime Minister who couldn’t speak Hindi, and a Muslim president. Is it possible to name even one other country that would allow a foreign born woman to be it’s leader? Even the US hasn’t had a female president till date.

With such variety, everyone expected India to fail as a democracy. Till that time, democracy was tried out only in countries that had a homogeneous environment. It was a huge social experiment, and we have survived where no one expected us to survive. We have had election after election (with a 2 year hiccup in the middle) and now our way of life is firmly established. Political parties humbly accept the verdict of the people even when it means that entrenched powers must be displaced. The BJP moved over without a squeal in 2004 after losing despite being a “hardline” party. Something that by no means happens around the world. Look at Zimbabwe last year.

Also, it is a widely held belief that democracy is best sustained when the surrounding regions are democratic as well. In this aspect too, India has been an enigma. Surrounded by neighbors whose governments are either powerfully compromised, or not democracies at all, India is a glimmering example of holding onto ideals. A diamond in the rocks.

Democracy at work in India

Democracy at work in India

As Obama proclaimed a few days ago, “India is a shining example to us all.”

Comparisons with China

Most people when condemning India’s democracy point to China. The general drift of their logic goes something like this: “China is not a democracy. Look at them. Look at their growth. They have vision. They have long term policies. They are a growing power. The world is afraid of them etc etc.”

My only answer is: “So bloody what?”

Correlation does not equal causation. There are plenty of countries that are not democracies who are not doing well. Why don’t we look to our western neighbor Pakistan and praise their military for having taken over the country innumerable number of times? No. That we will not do. But we look at China and want to be like them. Also, we must realize once and for all, that the purpose of the government is for the people. The people cannot be used to serve the goals of the government or country. So if the country as a whole is successful and the people within it are not happy and don’t have the right to speak freely, then such a state is a failure, not a success.

China’s state and future

Each country is different. China as a country is much more homogeneous than India. They have a shared common history, a largely common language and similar ethnic origins. Nowhere close to the diversity of India.

Moreover, history shows that far from being an open and close case, China is extremely complex. There is evidence that as people in China get more prosperous, they will be less likely to want to submit to authority. Heed my words. In the next few decades, there will be an upheaval in China as more and more people start wishing for democracy. And it won’t be a peaceful transition. No one likes to give up power. There will be chaos as the country’s entrenched institutions try and hold onto power.

If what I say doesn’t happen, then well and good. No one wants misery and suffering. But the chances are that sooner or later, China will become like India, and not the other way around.

False choice between Freedom and Development

Another frequent argument that I hear all the time is that there are more pressing issues in India than freedom of speech and civil liberties. Proponents claim that the Indian government has better and more important things to do than to ensure that women can party at night, or to debate the legality of homosexuality. There are two major flaws in this logic. The first is that of the false dichotomy, and the second is to assume that without civil liberties, things like infrastructure matter a great deal.

The false dichotomy

It’s foolish to say “Concentrate on clean water, not on free speech.” Does the government have only one hand? Is it composed of only one person who can only do one thing at a time? Is it possibly conceivable that when the ministry for infrastructure is trying to get clean water to villages, the home ministry has to stop functioning? Beware of the false dichotomy.

My feeling is that when people say stupid things like this, they mean something else. These people I suspect have a sense of guilt that they’re living comfortable lives when others are not and in order to try and cope with this, they want everyone else to suffer as well. Be that as it may, that is their problem and not relevant to this discussion.

Which matters more?

Those who claim that they would prefer India to be a dictatorship or an authoritarian state if trains ran on time and the roads were clean, either need a history lesson, or they’re in the wrong place.

Such individuals should have lived in Nazi Germany. Clean roads, potable water, economic security, nice cars, food for everyone – what more do you want right? Why not get a taste of Stasi’s East Berlin then? Sure, you never know if the man next to you is a government agent who can put you behind bars forever if you so much as utter word against the government. Or I suppose it’s completely irrelevant that you’re not supposed to hold any political views other than what the government wants you to have. Oh and did I mention that the news you read is “approved” by the state before it comes to you? And books? You can only read those sanctioned by the government – of course.

Oh and remember the free and fair Internet? – it’s a myth. There’s no such thing.

But hey – there were clean roads! And clean water!

Ok, enough of the heavy sarcasm. The bottom line is that people need to read up a bit of history. They need to know and imagine what it’s like to live under a state that has no freedoms. They need to get a taste of the feeling that you just want to scream out something abusive against the government – just for the sake of being able to do so.

There are people who have given up their very lives for freedom. Our Indian Freedom struggle is the best example. Who the hell cares if the Britishers were fantastic administrators? Did we sacrifice our lives and drive them out only so that we could have our very own home brewed dictators? Are we saying that only Indians have the right to be dictators over Indians?

It’s an insult to the memories of the freedom fighters when people say they would rather have a dictatorial government. Let them go to some other place where they can have their clean roads and towering skyscrapers – Democracy in India was bought with the blood of tens of thousands of people. It’s a national treasure, and one that every Indian must at least acknowledge if not respect.

Shining examples of India’s Democracy

For those still not satisfied with India’s remarkable achievement, here are some facts that should make you feel proud:

Congress got voted out after the Emergency

If people were so thrilled during the emergency with an orderly government and trains running on time, why did they boot the Congress government out immediately after? This shows that people love their freedoms and that the fabric of democracy runs deep.

Inquiries after atrocities

Atrocities happen in every country – in India, America, as well as China. What matters is how they are handled afterwards?

In China, what happened after the Tianmen Square massacre? Never mind that even the most corrupt Indian party wouldn’t dream of opening fire on unarmed and innocent protesters consisting mainly of students merely for voicing their frustration with the government. But what about the aftermath? Would you believe that the Chinese government doesn’t even allow it’s citizens to discuss the incident? Chinese history has been rewritten to ensure that people never learn about the massacre of 7000 people. The link that you find at the beginning of this paragraph is unaccessible in China. Children born afterwards don’t even know that it happened since it’s not mentioned in any textbooks. Their “progress” has been bought at a heavy price – such an incident if allowed to remain in people’s consciousness would destabilize the country. This shows that the Chinese way of life has deep problems that are only kept under the surface temporarily – waiting to come up to the surface. History has shown us that humans after all, eventually like to be free.

Image Credit: Grant Neufeld

Tiananmen Squaure Massacre Protest - Mind you, this is outside the Chinese Consulate in Canada. Such a protest would not be allowed within China itself

Tiananmen Squaure Massacre Protest – Mind you, this is outside the Chinese Consulate in Canada. Such a protest would not be allowed within China itself

On the other hand, atrocities in India always come back to bite their perpetrators years later. There is no public misinformation campaign. No changing of textbooks. The Anti Sikh riot protests in 1984 still return to plague the Congress. Advani is still tainted with the demolition of the Babri Masjid and Narendra Modi will never be free of the black mark of the Godhra riots and may even go to jail for it. Such a thing could never happen in China where there is no free press and the government prevents any official inquiry into the matter.

Right to Information Act (RTI)

Things move slowly in India, but they do move. The RTI act was a huge step forward and while it’s implementation is not very satisfactory, there is at least the intention. The implementation will come in time. Can you imagine such a thing happening in China?

Public Debate

Remember the Indo US nuclear deal which almost brought the government down? Remember the debate? The news coverage? The analysis? None of that would have been possible in an authoritarian state. The government would have just done whatever it wants.

An Independent Judiciary

This is nothing to be sneezed at. The Supreme Court of India has proved to be a wonderful institution with its concept of the PIL and the “Basic Structure” doctrine. Only in a democratic country like India, can a private NGO like NAZ file a case against the government for the criminalization of Homosexuality (Article 377).

Give it time

The people of the country shouldn’t be in a hurry. 60 years is a very short time for a country of the size and diversity of India. America has been a Democracy for around 200 years now, and it was only 30 years ago that discrimination against blacks was removed – similar to our caste system, but legalized. That way, we are even better off than they are.

Countries in the EU have had upwards of 400 years to practice and perfect their democracy and none of them is as diverse or as large as India. Given what we’ve achieved after 60 years, it’s a bloody miracle. So cut some slack. You’re living in a miraculous country that has defied every single prediction made about it. You’re free.

Don’t compare India with China. Let them be the “greatest.” Let them be “feared.” So what, even if it is true (Debatable – how do you define “great”)? It’s not worth the price of freedom. Our own growth is nothing to be sneezed at. We’re a democracy, and we’re headed in the right direction.

The very same charge that people level against India, is actually it’s greatest strength – it’s complacency. We’re relaxed. We pose no threat to anyone. No one cares so much that they’re willing to sacrifice themselves for radical change. The common man doesn’t like the extremism that can accompany “progress”. We’re content to let things take their own sweet course. And we’re happy. So don’t worry. Everything will be just fine.

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Politics Tags:

Indian Elections – 5 issues that matter

March 28th, 2009 1 comment

With all the election fever going around, I thought it’s time that I put in my views about what I would most like to see changed in the country on a priority basis. I know that there are a lot of things that can be improved, some of them easy to change, and some of them hard. Some cost money, and some don’t. But without further ado, here are my top issues.

The List

True Freedom of Speech

India is a very free country. When I read about situations in various parts of the world, it seems to me sometimes that we are more free than much of the west. However, we are yet to achieve true freedom of speech.

I’ve lost track of the number of times a person has been attacked for “hurting religious sentiments” even though the remarks made were quite justified. If someone says that the bridge to Sri Lanka that was depicted in the Ramayana is a myth, he is busted for wounding people’s feelings. The Da Vinci code was almost banned because it “hurt the religious feelings of christians.” A book questioning the existence of Shivaji was almost banned.

This is utter nonsense. First of all, no one forces people to walk into a theater or read a book. There must be more tolerance of the opinions of other people as long as they don’t fling their opinions in your face. I wouldn’t want the Da Vinci Code to be broadcast in public – but if you don’t want to watch it in the theater, then don’t! If you don’t want to read a book, then don’t read it. But don’t ban the book saying that it hurts people. Adults don’t deserve to be treated as children by telling them what to read or watch.

Image Credit: Rosh PR

Indian Elections - Issues that matter

Indian Elections – Issues that matter

Similarly, Bloggers should get the same rights that Media People have if they are expected to shoulder the same responsibilities. Barkha Dutt’s recent attack on a blogger (Download the original post on Wikileaks) shows that she doesn’t give bloggers the same rights that she expects herself. As readers can judge for themselves, the original post isn’t really abusive.

Overall tolerance for people’s right to say and express themselves in whatever way they want is relatively lacking in the country. If people are offended, they shouldn’t listen.

More respect for the privacy of people

The recent IT amendments have really wiped away all expectations of privacy. To make matters worse, there was absolutely no debate whatsoever and the whole thing was passed in a slipshod manner. In this country, people still don’t appreciate that people must have a right to privacy. The prevailing logic is “If you have nothing to hide, then you shouldn’t be ashamed.” – Not so. I have nothing to hide, but I’m a private person by nature. I like to remain anonymous. I don’t want surveillance cameras tracking me on the street.

Some years ago, I refused to give my ID to Airtel when I went to cancel my Internet service. Nothing to hide, I just didn’t like the idea of having to prove who I was. According to them, I must have some ID or the other. But I don’t drive, I didn’t have an electric or a phone connection in my name, and they wouldn’t accept my PAN (No photograph). Does that mean I’m less of a citizen? Does that mean I’m a terrorist? I told them that I was leaving the city and that I was merely performing a formality by canceling my account with them. If they don’t want to do it, that’s fine – They agreed to finally cancel it without an ID.

I also believe that Universal ID cards are a threat to privacy.

Repeal of Article 377 (Homosexuality)

While this doesn’t directly affect me, it pains me to live in a country where people don’t have the right to live as they please as long as they don’t hurt anyone else. Closely connected to the expectation of privacy, the government has no business telling people what their sexual orientation should be.

The logic of “it’s not Indian culture” fails when one tries to identify what exactly “Indian culture” is, and why we should all follow it.

Zero tolerance of Moral Policing

This is really a no brainer. I have a strong suspicion that all moral policing is done to garner attention for political ends. Beating up women in a pub to “Protect Indian Culture” is the limit. Once more, people need to be more tolerant and learn to leave others alone. No one is anyone else’s keeper. There is arrogance in the stance of a person who claims to be protecting Indian culture. They assume that they’re right and that others are wrong. It can’t be condoned or tolerated.

The faster administration of Justice

Courts in India need to be more accessible to everyone involved including those in the rural areas and cases should be dispensed with more speedily. “Justice delayed is justice denied” should be the motto of the government. Increased funding to the Judiciary and a higher Judge to population ratio are essential.

Summary

This list contrasts with what most of India is demanding, namely better infrastructure, clean roads and the reduction of corruption. However, in my opinion, none of these threaten the foundation of India in the way the issues listed above do. In order to ensure a strong and firm footing for democracy, issues even more basic than clean roads need to be addressed.

There are people who feel that things like Free speech are secondary to good infrastructure. Does that mean that they would rather be under a dictatorship that provided all these amenities? A dictatorship like China perhaps? These people should also learn from history and realize that the the most gory incidents in the world like the Holocaust were the result of intolerance – not the lack of basic amenities.

True freedom is what I ask for. Of all the countries in South East Asia, India is one of the closest to realizing it.

Similar Posts:

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: Politics Tags: