You can't claim to be against conversions and then support *ghar wapsi*. In reality, the RSS is just lazy. It wants to retain Hindus in their club, but don't want to do the hard work of giving them reasons to stay. It's a free market. Go offer a better product than your competitors if you want to succeed.<br></br>creative commons licensed (BY-NC-ND) flickr photo by photomaga:

I’m Confused – Is the RSS for or Against Conversions?

The RSS and other hindutva type organizations are schizophrenic. On the one hand they hate conversions, and on the other hand they want to perform “ghar wapsi”. Is “ghar wapsi” the same as conversion? Well – if it walks looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck…

And don’t even start with that crap about “everyone is a Hindu”. If we go down that road, then I submit that we’re all Africans worshiping totems, the weather, or maybe nothing. After all – that’s where mankind originated right? If you’re going to “stick to your roots”, then why not go the whole hog?

The root of the problem is that the RSS, VHP and other Hindu organizations of this type both hate AND love Islam/Christianity. On the one hand, they want to make India a “Hindu Rashtra”, talk about Muslims multiplying, and go into hysterics when the percentage of Muslims increases by a paltry 0.8%.

But they also love Islam and Christianity. They want to emulate Islam’s practices and talk about how Hindus are “weak” in comparison to Muslims. This is why they are so conflicted.

So what does the RSS actually want? How can it claim to be against conversions and then turn around and do ghar wapsi? Of course, I personally have no problems with the RSS converting, re converting, or re re re converting anyone. Unlike what the Hindutva organizations claim, there is no such thing as forced conversions.

I think the truth is just that the RSS, VHP etc are just lazy. They want more members for their Hindu club, but don’t want to put in effort like Christian missionaries. They don’t WANT to go around offering people a better life, a better deal. They resent other religions for presenting a better product. If tomorrow Coke were to suddenly demand a law banning people from switching brands even if Pepsi offers a better product, that would be like the RSS.

Well tough luck. It’s a free market baby. You want club membership, you better entice your clients with a better experience than other clubs. Offer some more benefits, remove caste discrimination, offer free education etc. Otherwise why will people subscribe to your religion? Go compete!

No Comments
You think it's not possible to have a society where everyone insults and abuses others? Well, here's your chance. I give everyone in the world full permission to insult and abuse me using any words of their choosing. Go ahead! Watch how effortlessly I can ignore you.<br></br>
creative commons licensed (BY-NC-ND) flickr photo by bronx.:

You Have my Full Permission to Insult Me

Every time the issue of free speech comes up, some joker makes a comment saying "What if I were to insult you and abuse you? How would you feel then?" The recent legal troubles of the AIB roast highlight the problem of busybodies in India. Jobless … [Continue reading]

Do *True Believers* have to follow the <strong>literal</strong> word of the Quran or Bible? Is it mere opinion that everything must be *contextualized*? The word of God after all is the word of God. So do all religions including Hinduism inevitably lead to brutality and terror when followed strictly and literally?<br></br>
creative commons licensed (BY-NC-ND) flickr photo by Rishi S:

“True” Islam or Christianity = Terror?

In case there was any doubt as to my stance, the cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo bear no responsibility whatsoever for their deaths. In the same way that I do not blame a rape victim for "provoking" men based on what she wears or how she behaves, I … [Continue reading]

Doctors have no right to impose their ethics onto other people. After providing all the medically relevant information, the decision for a procedure needs to be left to the patient. This is often violated when it comes to procedures like the sterilization of childfree women.<br></br>

creative commons licensed (BY-NC) flickr photo by Alex E. Proimos:

Sterilize me – No Morals Please!

Anupa and I have decided to not have children. Ever. We're damn sure even after 8 years of marriage. A while ago, she showed symptoms of endometriosis - a very common problem affecting women in general (thank god I'm not a woman!). One procedure that … [Continue reading]

Airtel's decision to charge extra for VoIP data arises from its conflict of interest. Its *Phone* business is suffering due to its *Data* business, and so it's tempted to make up the difference by charging us for what it has no right to charge us for. How about we split it up into 2 companies instead. Let the *Phone* Airtel be a separate business from the *Data* Airtel. Problem solved! <br></br>
creative commons licensed (BY-NC) flickr photo by Artiii:

VoIP Charges – Time to Split Airtel into 2 Companies?

Airtel's decision to charge extra for VoIP data compared to others is clearly anti competitive. When Airtel sells us a data package, we are paying for just that - data. Bits and bytes. Bandwidth. That is what Airtel sells, and that is what we use. To … [Continue reading]


USB Phones in Ancient India

You know we've reached a tipping point in craziness when a conversation like this happens on a news article about planes existing in the vedic age.   I can totally imagine this poor woman's face right now: … [Continue reading]

When someone offers to help you save your dying child for a price, show some gratitude. Having the choice doesn't leave you worse off than you were before. And if you have a problem with what Christian missionaries do, then get off your ass and offer to help them yourself. <br></br>
creative commons licensed (BY-NC-ND) flickr photo by danielkedinger:

Christian Missionaries – Show some Fucking Gratitude

Recently, an article in the Huffington Post really pissed me off. It talked about how Christian missionaries are doing terrible things in India by...offering to pay for your kid's life threatening illness. Wait what? Here's the scenario. Your … [Continue reading]

There is nothing wrong with accepting money to change your religion. Everyone knows that brands can offer incentives to promote their products. So what is wrong with religions tempting people with money, food, or education to join their club? <br></br>
creative commons licensed (BY-NC-SA) flickr photo by Albert Freeman:

What is Wrong with Religious Conversions for Money?

I see nothing wrong with organizations like the RSS and VHP paying people to convert (or reconvert) back to Hinduism. This "Ghar Wapsi" project is exactly what they should be doing. As long as there is no force or physical coercion involved, paying … [Continue reading]

Rape isn't an accident that *just happens*. It requires careful consideration of risks and a lot of planning and forethought. Can we finally stop pretending that rapists *lose control* and that they're a victim of circumstances? <br></br>
creative commons licensed (BY-NC-ND) flickr photo by kurichan+:

Uber Case – Rape is Not a “Mistake”

India labors under the misconception that rape is something that "happens" as much to the criminal, as to the victim. Remember the Shakti Mills Mumbai gang rape involving a photojournalist? The mother of the perpetrator said "What was my son supposed … [Continue reading]

Sex is not something taken from a woman in exchange for marriage. Holding a man responsible for cheating a woman by reneging on a promise of marriage simply means that you view marriage as nothing but glorified prostitution.<br></br>
creative commons licensed (BY-ND) flickr photo by Skley:

Should “Cheating” a Woman Be a Crime?

Rape is a very serious crime. But is it rape when a man backs off from his promise to marry a woman? I don't think so. Rape is a very specific crime - sex without consent or with invalid consent. Anything else is consensual regardless of the … [Continue reading]