The bail applications of Jayalalitha and Salman Khan should have only been heard after those of everyone else before them. These "expedited hearings" are what allow the rich and powerful to ignore the broken legal system in India. A strict "First in First out" set up would force them to provide speedy justice for everyone.

Salman Khan Case: Make Jumping the Bail Queue Illegal

Salman Khan and Jayalalitha – two cases in one week exemplify the problem of justice in India. I’m not commenting on whether or not their getting out was right or wrong. My big problem is the fact that while they were released, lakhs of other undertrials lie rotting in India’s jails, with no bail in sight.

It took 18 years to convict Jayalalitha, but only 20 days to get bail. Salman Khan’s trial took 13 years. And he got bail in 2 days. In the meantime, undertrials who have never even had a chance to appear in court remain in jail for years because they don’t have money.

Apparently Salman Khan’s bail trial was heard on an “expeditious basis”. What nonsense! We need a law to make jumping the queue like this illegal, and only in a very limited, very specific set of circumstances with little discretion. Moreover, everyone’s case should be evaluated for expedited bail. No cutting the queue.

Money should be able to purchase better legal representation and better legal arguments. But not the ability to move your case forward in the first place. As soon as politicians and other rich people realize that they have to wait in line before everyone else like everyone else, they will damn well make sure to fix the system to ensure quick justice for everyone!

The Supreme Court needs to step in quickly and put an end to powerful people getting out of jail ahead of everyone else. Again – this is not about whether or not Jayalalitha and Salman Khan’s bail applications had merit. They may have, they may not have. But let them spend a few years in jail while the backlog is cleared and let them wait for their turn like the rest of us.

People with money should not be allowed to jump over everyone else. Let the brilliance of their lawyers show itself when their case comes up for hearing after those of others before them have been disposed. We need a strict “First in first out” system in place. Not because I’m vengeful against rich and powerful people, but because a FIFO set up would force politicians to make justice faster for everyone else, just to save their own hides.

1 Comment
As natural disasters go, the Nepal earthquake has been a monster. So much suffering, damage, and carnage. So why does it not affect me in the least?

Nepal Earthquake – Why Don’t I Feel Anything?

By all accounts, the devastation in Nepal is unimaginable. With a magnitude of 7.8, it was a monster especially given that the Richter scale is logarithmic. I've heard of the devastation. I've heard of aid flowing in from all across the world. I know … [Continue reading]


The Apple Watch Inspired me to Buy a Mechanical Watch!

I was sorely tempted to buy the Motorola 360 - it looks gorgeous. But then the Apple watch marketing blitzkrieg hit and I was treated to image after image of a "meh" looking smartwatch. Surprisingly, it had an effect on me. It instilled a yearning to … [Continue reading]

I believe in due process, and in the law. But when the law deliberately and maliciously fails me, I don't think I will have any qualms about meting out justice on my own.<br></br>
creative commons licensed (BY) flickr photo by quapan:

When Will I Take The Law into my Own Hands?

The lynching of a man accused of rape in Nagaland, raised questions about mob justice - and in light of subsequent revelations, its dangers. Like everyone, I agree that due process must be followed, and is a cornerstone of our Constitution. I hold no … [Continue reading]

The usage of rape statistics to prove that India is somehow safer than Sweden is beyond ridiculous. It requires a unique kind of delusional thinking coupled with blind jingoism to ignore reality like this. <br></br>
creative commons licensed (BY) flickr photo by LendingMemo:

Nirbhaya Was Not Raped! – Bullshit Official Statistics

The documentary "India's Daughter" has angered people in India who like to feel victimized by the "west". According to these guys, the rape situation in India is actually better than in most countries. And to prove it, they show...wait for … [Continue reading]

Why do people forget that Nirbhaya wasn't just raped? She was tortured, and murdered. Don't you think that the rape was the LEAST of what the poor girl went through?

Nirbhaya’s MURDERERS – Not her “Rapists”

I'm sick of people saying "Hang Nirbhaya's Rapist". I mean yeah, it's ridiculous how long the Indian state takes to carry out a sentence, but that's not the point. No, the reason why I'm pissed off is because Nirbhaya was not just raped. She was … [Continue reading]

You may think that those demanding the death penalty for rape are fighting for a woman's dignity. I do not believe that is the case. In fact, quite the opposite.<br></br>creative commons licensed (BY-NC) flickr photo by ramesh_lalwani:

The Death Penalty for Rape Actually Degrades Women

I'd just finished writing about the practical problems of instituting the death penalty for rape. Enough people these days demand the death sentence for rapists. We're not talking about "rarest of the rare" cases like the Nirbhaya episode, where the … [Continue reading]


Do you Have a Disqus Account?

I keep debating whether or not I should replace my comments section with Disqus. But the biggest thing holding me back is that people need a Disqus account. However, I'm pretty sure that most commenters already have a Disqus account, so here's quick … [Continue reading]

The Nirbhaya rapist is a jerk. He can't take responsibility for his own actions. But he's right about one thing - the death penalty for rape is a bad idea.<br></br>

creative commons licensed (BY-NC) flickr photo by mlhradio:

Nirbhaya’s Rapist is Right About the Death Penalty

This asshole tries to justify his assault and murder of a woman because she was out late at night. Well, that's expected. A rapist take responsibility for his actions? Never! He's right about one thing though. The death sentence for rape per se is … [Continue reading]

You can't claim to be against conversions and then support *ghar wapsi*. In reality, the RSS is just lazy. It wants to retain Hindus in their club, but don't want to do the hard work of giving them reasons to stay. It's a free market. Go offer a better product than your competitors if you want to succeed.<br></br>creative commons licensed (BY-NC-ND) flickr photo by photomaga:

I’m Confused – Is the RSS for or Against Conversions?

The RSS and other hindutva type organizations are schizophrenic. On the one hand they hate conversions, and on the other hand they want to perform "ghar wapsi". Is "ghar wapsi" the same as conversion? Well - if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck … [Continue reading]